| adrenochrome wrote: |
| German teechnology |
| benkloepfer wrote: |
| cks69
what are you talking about? If you are like me and fly with little luggage then its the best way to get out of shanghai. Take the metro to longyang (from PuXi 5 RMB) then take the maglev to the airport (with ticket 50 RMB) Total 55 RMB and about 1 hour Let me see you get from Puxi to the airport with less money or time! (assuming you don't have a car and driver) |
| Quote: |
|
And saving prohibitive electricity costs is what I was told was the reason for abandoning the idea of extending it to Beijing. |
| Quote: |
| American Invention
http://www.calpoly.edu/~cm/studpage/clottich/maglev_hist.html |
| Quote: |
|
If sucha thing were ever made in Bombay, I'd burst with pride I think... but that's utopian, so I can keep dreaming on. |
| Quote: |
|
Ignorance is bliss, so I'll turn a blind eye to the economics. The Walrus and the french Carpenter can continue their little game on those issues. |
| tmalg wrote: |
| American Invention
http://www.calpoly.edu/~cm/studpage/clottich/maglev_hist.html |
| Quote: |
| Laithwaite's ideas, of no use to the British Government, were rapidly picked up by the Japanese and Germans as the oil crisis began to bite. Undaunted, Laithwaite continued to develop his theories and soon replaced the hovercraft principle with magnetic levitation. This relied on the repelling power of like poles of magnets to lift and move a craft along a track at speed. Although "Maglev" trains were relatively cheap, only one was built in Britain, at Birmingham airport. Japan and Germany were again quicker to see the benefits.
For the next 20 years, the costs of Maglev and controversy surrounding Laithwaite's thinking on other scientific matters (notably the propelling qualities of gyroscopes) meant his work on linear motors was ignored. Magnetic levitation was relegated from the frontier of technology to a place as one of Q's toys in the James Bond film The Spy Who Loved Me (1977) - Major Boothroyd uses it to propel a tray at decapitating speed. |
| guel27 wrote: |
| Shanghai Pudong Airport Maglev Schedule
First train: 8:30 am Last train: 5:30 pm intervals: 20 minutes ticket price: 40rmb Highest speed: 430km/h Trip distance: 30 km Single trip: 8 minutes |
| waingro wrote: |
| once line 2 subway gets extended to both Pudong and Hongqiao airports by 2010, the maglev will become a useless gimmick |
| Sun09 wrote: |
| is Longyang station in waking distance from maglev terminus? |
| 8lrr8 wrote: |
| ^ ~10billion rmb at the time. |
| jeffinflorida wrote: |
| I agree that for that amount of money it's an elephant and based on it's current location and limitations it has limited usefulness and perhaps lifespan. |
| bigroh73 wrote: |
| And, when, will they eventually extend it any further.??
I know they did announce big plans for this last year, but so many apartment owners complained about the close proximity of the extended line to their house that the govt was embarrassingly forced to back down - although they painted a positive view of it. |
| joshuasrand wrote: |
| Can anyone please help me figure out how to get to Jiaxing from the PDX airport using mass transit, I read in the thread that the Maglev stops running at 9pm. My flight comes in at 9:30pm. Thanks |
| chingiskhan wrote: |
| I am pretty sure the BJ line is a normal rail ine NOT Magnetic Levitation technology. It's a pity because that 14 hour journey would be perfect for this technology, but the cost is prohibitive. The new line I think is a high speed rail link and will cut the journey from 13-14 hours down to about 5 or 6 hours. |
| Quote: |
|
Hmmn, the maglev might be good for BJ but it isn't quite perfect. I can think of a few alterations that would make it better... - the trains themsleves should be made so that they can be transferred to other destinations, or it can be run along alternative routes if the line was blocked meaning a whole new entirely hybrid maglev/conventional system would have to be developped - the line itself along the route needs to be raised higher off the ground, so that it is further away from people who might be disturbed by the noise - if the line is really high, then it can travel where the air is thinner and so there would be less air resistance I like the idea of having concrete pylons going up about 3000m to where MAYBE airresistance might be a tad lower - that is going to endear the project to residents no end, not to speak about making the the day for cement companies.... other aspects come to mind when picturing this line, eg. escape routes (maybe slides?) - they should use existing infrastructure if possible - it would be really great if they did not have to build new tracks along the way this one jives rally well with the recommendation just above; having to find a pre-existing low air resistance rail-line will limit the appliction of this technology... - it should link up with the existing maglev line as well, maybe at the airport - of course, it has to be no more polluting than air travel at the moment, otherwise what's the point. If only we had the technology |
| Quote: |
|
- the trains themselves should be made so that they can be transferred to other destinations, or it can be run along alternative routes if the line was blocked SO, WE SHOULD BUILD ANOTHER LINE SO THE TRAINS CAN BE TRANSFERRED?? KEEP IN MIND THAT THE MAGLEV TRAINS DO NOT RUN ON NORMAL RAIL LINE TRACKS - the line itself along the route needs to be raised higher off the ground, so that it is further away from people who might be disturbed by the noise HOW MUCH HIGHER SHOULD IT BE?? THE EXISTING LINE TO BJ SHOULD BE RAISED 30FT IN THE AIR?? HOW LONG WOULD IT TAKE TO DO THAT...GIVEN THAT THE TRACKS ARE A DIFFERENT TYPE. OH - HANG ON - THERE ARE 20 MILLION MIGRANT WORKERS WITH NO JOB - PROBLEM SOLVED!!! - if the line is really high, then it can travel where the air is thinner and so there would be less air resistance MAKE IT HIGHER WHERE THE AIR IS THINNER.??? DOES ANYONE KNOW HOW HIGH IT MUST BE BEFORE THE THINNER AIR IS NOTICEABLE?? THAT MUST BE A FEW THOUSAND FEET, RIGHT?? - they should use existing infrastructure if possible - it would be really great if they did not have to build new tracks along the way YEAH, LETS PUT THE MAGLEV TRAIN ON EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE - THAT WILL WORK....RIGHT GUYS??? WE DON'T NEED SPECIAL TRACKS FOR THE MAGLEV...... - of course, it has to be no more polluting than air travel at the moment, otherwise what's the point. WELL OF COURSE - ANOTHER MAGLEV THAT DOES NOT RUN ON AVIATION FUEL - IT MUST BE CLEANER!!! If only we had the technology |